Cases 21 - 30 of 2,638
Tompkins #518783 v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv00719
Respondent:
David A. Thompson, Jennifer Houke-Born, Michael Burgess and others
Petitioner:
Boston Jermaine Tompkins #518783
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
Robert Ethan Miller
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cornelius Carolina v. Robert Miller
as 24-2102
Respondent:
ROBERT MILLER, Warden
Petitioner:
CORNELIUS CAROLINA
Sims v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Defendant:
Michael Cunningham, Joshua Finkley and Keith Miller
Plaintiff:
Wesley Robert Sims
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leggett v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00357
Defendant:
Captain George, Sgt. McBride, Sgt. Terry Hern and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Deshun R. Leggett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01652
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Petitioner:
Earl D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Dickerson
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Kimberly Dean Miller
Respondent:
Stanley Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. PELESKY et al
as 3:2024cv00129
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SOMERSET COUNTY and PELESKY
Petitioner:
MATTHEW R. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00972
Petitioner:
CHARLES MILLER
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaDuke v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00748
Petitioner:
Robert LaDuke
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
