Cases 41 - 50 of 742
Miles Cooke v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 23-1172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILES COOKE
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Cook v. Stroud
as 4:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Cook
Respondent:
Marcy Stroud
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Damon Cook v. George Galaza
as 23-55067
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMON B. COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
GEORGE M. GALAZA, Warden
Cook v. Stroud
as 4:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Cook
Respondent:
Marcy Stroud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2022cv03091
Petitioner:
Glenn Cook
Respondent:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cook v. Ames
as 3:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Ray Cook
Respondent:
Donald F. Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bragg et al
as 5:2022cv03980
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Travis Bragg, David Andrew Cook, Charles Lemon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Cook v. Williams, et al
as 22-1384
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN MATTHEW COOK
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
