Cases 41 - 50 of 145
ROSARIO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00039
Petitioner:
KEITH ROSARIO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ledwin Q. Del Rosario v. Superior Court of California et al
as 2:2019cv00205
Respondent:
Mr. Sullivan, Superior Court of California and County of Los Angeles
Petitioner:
Mr. Ledwin Q. Del Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2019cv00008
Petitioner:
Angelo Rosario
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Entzel
as 1:2018cv00213
Respondent:
Frederick Entzel
Petitioner:
Luis Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosario v. Goguen
as 4:2018cv40180
Petitioner:
Jose A. Rosario
Respondent:
Colette Gogien and Superintendent Colette Goguen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Colvin
as 9:2018cv00988
Respondent:
John Colvin
Petitioner:
Jorge Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Arriaga v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-50506
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE ROSARIO ARRIAGA
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
MIRAGLIA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv07944
Petitioner:
ROSARIO MIRAGLIA
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valle-Rosario v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
as 3:2018cv01190
Petitioner:
Wendell Valle-Rosario
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arriaga v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00258
Petitioner:
Jose Rosario Arriaga
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
