Cases 71 - 80 of 1,086
Cedano-Sanchez v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv00548
Petitioner:
Omar Bonifacio Cedano-Sanchez
Respondent:
LSCI-Allenwood Warden R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv01311
Petitioner:
CESAR SANCHEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv01111
Petitioner:
JEREMIAS SANCHEZ
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Everado Sanchez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacinto Sanchez v. L. Bird
as 2:2023cv01702
Petitioner:
Jacinto Sanchez
Respondent:
L Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Divris
as 23-1172
Petitioner / Appellant:
OSCAR SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW DIVRIS, Superintendent, North Central Correctional Institution at Gardner
Sanchez-Colin v. Neely
as 7:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Irene Sanchez-Colin
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moreno-Sanchez v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Santos Moreno-Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanchez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00116
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Jose Martin Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
