Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Barry-Gibbons v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Stephen Maurice Barry-Gibbons
Respondent:
Superintendent MICHAEL GOURLEY and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons
as 1:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Respondent:
Tracey Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luke v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Christopher Luke
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Central Falls Detention Facility Corporation, Warden Michael Nessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barry-Gibbons v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv00694
Petitioner:
Stephen Maurice Barry-Gibbons
Respondent:
Michael Gourley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbons v. Cox
as 2:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
Euric Gibbons
Respondent:
Warden Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor, et al v. McDermott, et al
as 21-1083
Respondent / Appellee:
JEROME P. MCDERMOTT, Sheriff, Norfolk, County, Massachusetts and JOHN GIBBONS, United States Marshal, District of Massachusetts
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL L. TAYLOR and PETER MAXWELL TAYLOR
GIBBONS v. WARDEN
as 1:2020cv01425
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
HARMONY GIBBONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor et al v. McDermott et al
as 4:2020cv11272
Petitioner:
Michael L Taylor and Peter Maxwell Taylor
Respondent:
Jerome P McDermott and John Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GIBBONS v. WARDEN
as 2:2019cv00488
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
HARMONY GIBBONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguasvivas v. Pompeo et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Petitioner:
Christian Aguasvivas
Respondent:
Mike Pompeo, John Gibbons, William Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
