Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darmel Smith v. Brittany Greene
as 24-1237
Petitioner:
DARMEL L. SMITH
Respondent:
BRITTANY GREENE, Warden
Darmel Smith v. Brittany Greene
as 24-1221
Petitioner:
DARMEL L. SMITH
Respondent:
BRITTANY GREENE, Warden
Smith v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11660
Petitioner:
Steven L Smith
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Jason L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Leroy Smith v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-1521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY L. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE and CHAIRMAN UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Gary L. Smith
Respondent:
United States of America, U.S. Marshal Service and Santa Rita Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hunter v. Smith
as 1:2022cv03904
Petitioner:
John A. Hunter
Respondent:
Warden L. Smith and State of Georgia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00695
Petitioner:
SHERMAN L. SMITH
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
