Cases 1 - 10 of 3,058
Owens v. Lewis
as 4:2024cv00102
Respondent:
Mike Lewis
Petitioner:
Jaron Whitney Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00522
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00523
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LEWIS, III v. THOMPSON
as 3:2024cv09374
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. NEWMAN
as 1:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
JAMES DWIGHT LEWIS
Respondent:
WARDEN NEWMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Southard v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01146
Petitioner:
Lewis R Southard
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lewis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 2:2024cv00816
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Samuel Jerome Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kimberly v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00590
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
Arron Michael Lewis and Annastasia Nicole Kimberly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lewis v. Warden of FCI-Schuylkill
as 1:2024cv01481
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Schuylkill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00712
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
BARRON BERNARD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
