Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MCCLELLAND v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01924
Petitioner:
DAVID J. MCCLELLAND
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClelland v. State of Ohio et al
as 5:2022cv01928
Petitioner:
Dennis McClelland, II
Respondent:
State of Ohio and John Doe Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweeney v. Woodward et al
as 2:2019cv00125
Respondent:
Officer S. Bowman, Stephanie Woodward, Mollie M. Anderson and others
Petitioner:
Terence Joseph Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McClelland v. State of Texas
as 1:2017cv01215
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and State of Texas
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Anthony Wayne McClelland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClelland v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00450
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Kenneth McClelland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCLELLAND v. USA
as 1:2012cv00814
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MCCLELLAND
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curtis Roberson v. Cuyahoga County Ohio, et al
as 11-4403
Petitioner - Appellant:
CURTIS ROBERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CUYAHOGA COUNTY OHIO, TIMOTHY J. MCGINTY, WILLIAM D. MASON and others
Roberson v. Cuyahoga County Ohio et al
as 1:2011cv02202
Petitioner:
Curtis Roberson
Respondent:
Cuyahoga County Ohio , Timothy J. McGinty, William D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McClelland v. Kirkpatrick
as 11-1817
Petitioner - Appellant:
Carl McClelland
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Kirkpatrick
McClelland v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv00764
Petitioner:
Robert John McClelland
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
