Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Orr v. State of NC
as 3:2024cv00359
Petitioner:
Eric Christopher Orr
Respondent:
State of NC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orr v. Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
as 4:2024cv01463
Petitioner:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Respondent:
Director, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NUNLEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
WALTER J. NUNLEY
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS, BRADLEY HAMMOND, ROBERT ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams-Bey v. Wichita, City of et al
as 5:2023cv03130
Petitioner:
Kirk Franklin Williams-Bey and Kirk F. Williams
Respondent:
Wichita, City of, Mark Orr, Armand L. Shukaev and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orr v. United States of America, Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv03098
Petitioner:
Jeremy Orr
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice
Respondent:
David Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Eric Orr v. State of NC
as 23-6152
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC CHRISTOPHER ORR
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Willie Orr v. Brittany Greene
as 22-2875
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE D. ORR
Respondent / Appellee:
BRITTANY GREENE, Warden
John Leonard Orr v. P. Covello
as 2:2022cv07513
Petitioner:
John Leonard Orr
Respondent:
P. Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orr v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03424
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Orr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orr v. USA
as 22-30300
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Ma'at
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
