Cases 1 - 10 of 7,390
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03215
Petitioner:
DEONDRE E. SMITH
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, GEORGE WHARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02112
Petitioner:
Stephen Brooks
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Estes v. Tabor
as 2:2024cv02073
Petitioner:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Respondent:
Judge Stephen Tabor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heck v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02108
Petitioner:
Jeffery Stephen Heck
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Feathers v. Stephen Reynolds
as 24-3466
Petitioner:
DAVID E. FEATHERS
Respondent:
STEPHEN REYNOLDS, Warden
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
HART v. SEVERE
as 1:2024cv00862
Defendant:
MARK SEVERE
Petitioner:
STEPHEN S. HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keer v. Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00818
Petitioner:
Timothy Stephen Keer
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Quehanna Boot Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
