General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,340
Bonilla
as 4:2024cv03506
Petitioner: Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Steven L. Harris v. Chantell Jewell
as 24-1999
Petitioner: STEVEN L. HARRIS
Respondent: CHANTELL JEWELL
Stevens v. Jones
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner: YAKENSKI STEVENS
Respondent: JOSHUA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Girtler v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00727
Petitioner: Mark Anthony Girtler
Respondent: C Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Perkins
as 4:2024cv05058
Petitioner: Dakota Edward Stevens
Respondent: Jeffrey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Lumpkin
as 24-20254
Petitioner: Steven Cecillio Torres
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Samuel v. Darlington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv03410
Petitioner: Steven Lewis Samuel and Steven Samuel,
Respondent: Darlington County Detention Center, Sheriff James Hudson and Warden Wadell Coe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner: KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent: U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VILLALONA v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv06696
Petitioner: STEVEN VILLALONA
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cleckler v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?