Cases 1 - 10 of 7,147
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00966
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 1:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenbarg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cleckler v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Bolin v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Petitioner:
Paul C. Bolin
Respondent:
Rachael Newcomb and T. Falkenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILLMAN v. SELF et al
as 5:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
MARVIN HILLMAN, III
Respondent:
JUDGE TILLMAN E. SELF, JUDGE CONNIE LYNN WILLIFORD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLIFFORD T WOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Ryan T Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Roberts v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11688
Petitioner:
JAMES T. ROBERTS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Seibert, Jerrad v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Jerrad T. Seibert
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PERRY v. PHIPPS et al
as 2:2024cv02835
Plaintiff:
RODNEY A. PERRY
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, MIKE E. MORGAN, BLAIR NANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
