Death Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 215
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: David P. Wilson
Defendant: John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renteria v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-70007
Petitioner / Appellant: David Santiago Renteria
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
David Rey Fierro v. Charles Schuyler
as 2:2023cv09180
Petitioner: David Rey Fierro
Respondent: Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnny Johnson v. David Vandergriff
as 23-2664
Petitioner / Appellant: Johnny A. Johnson
Respondent / Appellee: David Vandergriff, Warden
Johnson v. Vandergriff We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00845
Petitioner: Johnny A. Johnson
Respondent: Warden David Vandergriff and David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Elizabeth Peiffer
as 23-5
Appellant: In re: ELIZABETH JANE PEIFFER
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID ANTHONY RUNYON
Amicus Curiae: JAMES MICHAEL MCCAULEY, Esq. and PROFESSOR JAMES E. MOLITERNO
Michael Tisius v. David Vandergriff
as 23-2314
Petitioner: Michael A. Tisius
Respondent: David Vandergriff, Warden
David Matthews
as 23-5471
Petitioner: In re: DAVID EUGENE MATTHEWS
Respondent: RANDY L. WHITE and SCOTT JORDAN
David Bollinger v. William Gittere
as 23-99002
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID BOLLINGER
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden
Scott Clabourne v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-99000
Petitioner / Appellant: SCOTT DRAKE CLABOURNE
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, of the Arizona Department of Corrections and CHARLES GOLDSMITH, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?