Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Amerson v. USP Pollock
as 4:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Steven Amerson
Defendant:
USP Pollock and McCeary Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amerson v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Brett S Amerson and Brett Steven Amerson
Defendant:
Martha E. Williams, Jonathan England, Joseph Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashmore v. White et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00390
Defendant:
Brandon Hutto, Shane Healey, Det. Amerson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Armstead et al
as 1:2021cv00603
Defendant:
Tameka Amerson, Warden Laura Armstead, Chief of Security Winnie Mott and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Amerson v. Deberry et al
as 1:2020cv03326
Defendant:
Clerk of Court, Clerk Debra Deberry, Clerk J. Sibley and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Amerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Bland
as 6:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Sherry Bland
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Amerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2018cv00468
Plaintiff:
Lee Tommie Amerson
Defendant:
Sheriff Billy Sollie, Officer Aurion Leverett, Major Mellisa McCarter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Morgan Jerome Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
John Crow, Jacob Walker, III, Robert T. Treese, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Allen et al
as 6:2017cv00156
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Amerson
Defendant:
Marty Allen, Christopher M. Carr and Elizabeth Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amerson v. Allen et al
as 1:2017cv04098
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Amerson
Defendant:
Marty Allen, Christopher M. Carr and Elizabeth Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
