Cases 11 - 20 of 432
(PC) Eslami v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eslami
Defendant:
G. Matteson, T. Tyler, J. Cavagnolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tisdale
as 23-50637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Roderick Tisdale, Officer, Jason Petty, Officer and Michael May, U.S. Marshal
CRUZ v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2023cv16879
Plaintiff:
RAMOS M. CRUZ
Defendant:
WARDEN, OFFICER PETTY, OFFICER J.C. DARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Trujillo v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Larry Trujillo
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, N. Malakka, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Austin Devon Pettis
Defendant:
FNU Jones, FNU Smith, FNU Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr v. Tisdale et al
as 4:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Frank Alonzo Jones, JR
Defendant:
Roderick Tisdale, Jason Petty and Michael May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Jr v. Tisdale et al
as 6:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Frank Alonzo Jones, JR
Defendant:
Roderick Tisdale, Jason Petty and Michael May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Swims et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mose S. Williams
Defendant:
Garret A. Swims, Phillip M. Dobbs, William H. Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown El v. Does
as 4:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Dion Brown El
Defendant:
Does, John D Pettie, Kendall Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Garrido
as 23-10425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden FNU Garrido, FNU Swan, A.W., FNU McMannis, A.W. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
