Cases 41 - 50 of 4,508
Trevino v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe and FNU LNU (5:24-CV-88)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Warfield v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv04049
Plaintiff:
Kelly Warfield
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections and State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Mitchell v. Home et al
as 4:2024cv01656
Plaintiff:
Ivory R. Mitchell
Defendant:
Chief Home, Travis Turner, Joni White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
(PC) Kelly v. Hiaing
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
M. Hiaing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilcrist v. Middleton et al
as 8:2024cv02507
Plaintiff:
ADwan Cortavius Gilcrist
Defendant:
Cameron Middleton, Greenwood Police Department, T.J. Chaudoin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rutherford v. Linthieum et al
as 4:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Scott Rutherford
Defendant:
Lannette Linthieum, Owen Murray, Philip Keiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
