Cases 61 - 70 of 622
Woods v. Fluharty et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Wesley Fluharty, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobson v. AWP Currier, et al
as 2:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
Tony Hobson
Defendant:
AWP Currier, Cosgt Kelly, Cosgt Groover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Williamson et al
as 7:2022cv10494
Plaintiff:
Claude Reese
Defendant:
Robert Williamson, Steven Drapala, Richard Bodnar and others
Interested Party:
New York Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILMORE v. TAYLOR ET AL
as 2:2022cv04648
Plaintiff:
KHALIL GILMORE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS 1-4, Officer Clyde Taylor, Jr., Officer Roy Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wheeler et al v. The Fulton County Defacs Office in Atlanta Georgia et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
April S. Wheeler, Alliyah R. Wheeler, April Shantell Wheeler and others
Defendant:
The Fulton County Defacs Office in Atlanta Georgia and Reberta Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stull v. Greene et al
as 3:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
Barry Joe Stull
Defendant:
Flemming Greene, Mike Reese and Multnomah County Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noah Schroder v. Corizon Medical, et al
as 22-35778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOAH SCHRODER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL, ZAKROFF, PA REESE and others
Moore v. Bugher et al
as 6:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Gordon Talbert Moore
Defendant:
Joe Bugher, Dr. Warren Roberts, Tia Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. HUNT et al
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
SERGEANT GARY HUNT, SERGEANT REESE and MR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
