Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Larch v. Prosecuting Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tanner Moren Eagle Larch
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macbolan v. Valley Rental et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Baker Chris Macbolan
Defendant:
Valley Rental and Eagle Crest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LEWIS v. EAGLES
as 1:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
BRANDON RASHAD LEWIS
Defendant:
JUDGE CATHERINE EAGLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Hairston v. Eagle et al
as 1:2023cv12631
Plaintiff:
Ardell Hairston
Defendant:
Eagle, McNeil and Palmer
(PC) Long v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Long
Defendant:
United States, California, Stanislaus County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mogler et al v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Native American Ceremonial Drums Group, Stanley Dashee, Nicholas Lister and others
Defendant:
Collette Peters, RA Heisner and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robertson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Melvin Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Robert Taylor, City of Cleveland and Giant Eagle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOYCE v. USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH, ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Barnes, II, et al v. Robert Corclova, et al
as 23-35098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD LEROY BARNES II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JONATHAN ZARCHARKIW, Deputy
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT CORCLOVA, Deputy and JOSH EAGLE, Deputy
Stucky v. Loepp et al
as 5:2022cv03306
Plaintiff:
Forrest J. Stucky
Defendant:
(fnu) Loepp, (fnu) Shrag, Hutchinson Post and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
