Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Johnson v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson, Timothy L. Johnson and Timothy Leverne Johnson
Defendant:
Glenn Woods, Rhett Holden, Rodney A. Bostick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavergne v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lavergne
Defendant:
Timothy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Coker et al
as 4:2021cv03736
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Shannon Coker, Richard McCollugh, Glenn Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv03013
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Bryan Lumpkin and Warden J. Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2020cv00245
Defendant:
OFFICER SHADERIAN WILLIAMS and WARDEN TIMOTHY JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ramos et al
as 3:2018cv02311
Defendant:
Mr FNU Beavers, Ms FNU Ramirez, Mr T C Lloyd and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. MICHAEL ROGERS et al
as 1:2016cv02705
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, TROY RIGGS and MICHAEL ROGERS
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timothy Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00796
Plaintiff:
The Undersigned Prisoners and Timothy Johnson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
