Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Christine v. Western Missouri Correctional Center et al
as 5:2020cv06151
Plaintiff:
Earl Dennis Christine
Defendant:
Richards, Asby, Chris Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERIS v. SETTLES et al
as 1:2020cv00776
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SETTLES, K. ADAMS, GREEN and others
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Connors et al
as 5:2020ct03189
Defendant:
J. Wade, Director Inch, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Officers et al
as 5:2019ct03316
Defendant:
Director Inch, Thomas R Kane, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DAVIS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2019cv00135
Defendant:
THOMPSON, LINDA VANNETTA, DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engle v. Pope County Detention Center
as 4:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Justin Charles Engle
Defendant:
Pope County Detention Center, S Wallace and Bombgardener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERIS v. SETTLES et al
as 1:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Defendant:
SETTLES, GREEN, ENGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Rios et al
as 5:2017cv01311
Plaintiff:
Richard Dawson, Jr
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Ademola Aderagba, FNU James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Rios et al
as 5:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Chad Jeremy Adams
Defendant:
Hector Rios, Jr, GEO Group Inc, Dean Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
