Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Saquan Musgrove v. Correctional Officer Moore
as 22-7430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE and OFFICER A. JONES
Whitt v. King et al (INMATE 2) (MEMBER)
as 1:2021cv00741
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Sharon King, Officer Moore and Donald Valenza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1) (LEAD)
as 1:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, James Brazier and Officer Morris
Consolidated Defendant:
Sharon King and Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Stevens et al
as 2:2020cv00917
Defendant:
CO Zetech, Lt Brechbueller, Dr Darrow Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
David Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv03560
Defendant:
MS. BESTEDO, CHRISTINE NELSON, DR. ODEIDA DALMASI and others
Plaintiff:
TERENCE D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Hennessy et al
as 3:2019cv01681
Plaintiff:
Lance Maynard Gardner
Defendant:
City Attorney Dennis Herrera, Sheriff Vicki Hennessy and Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUSGROVE v. MOORE et al
as 1:2019cv00164
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MOORE, SGT. WHICHARD and OFFICER A. JONES
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN S. MUSGROVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Musgrove v. Moore et al
as 5:2019ct03035
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Moore, Sgt. Whichard and Officer A. Jones
Plaintiff:
Saquan S. Musgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duhart v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv00896
Defendant:
Officer Stone, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office, Duval Pretrial Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Rahien Jamaica Duhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Asbell et al
as 5:2018ct03144
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Thomas E. Asbell, II, Captain Fields, Captain Enzor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
