Cases 21 - 30 of 105
David Meyers v. Ronnie Scott
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SERGEANT DIAL and others
Little v. Florence County Detention Center et al
as 0:2022cv04288
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
Florence County Detention Center, Eric McDaniel, David Timmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
QUICK v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv02139
Plaintiff:
DANNY QUICK
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Gause et al
as 2:2022cv02531
Plaintiff:
Demetrius R. Spencer
Defendant:
Katurah Gause, Dlaquanta K. Quick and Sharice L. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald Jones v. Sandra Quick, et al
as 22-1237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SANDRA QUICK and FRANK LAWRENCE, Warden, Chief Administrative Officer, Menard CC
McClam v. Filyaw et al
as 6:2021cv03944
Plaintiff:
Lethe McClam
Defendant:
Charles Filyaw, Tommie Brogdon, Jeff Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUICK v. WATSON
as 1:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
DARRIS QUICK
Defendant:
SERGANT WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quick v. Wake County Sheriff's Office
as 5:2021ct03214
Plaintiff:
Darris M. Quick
Defendant:
Wake County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Armwood et al
as 9:2020cv02832
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Laquawn Thomas
Defendant:
Corporal Richardson, Sergeant Quick and Tamara Armwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
