Cases 21 - 30 of 912
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence Jenkins v. Aspirus Eye Clinic, et al
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE JENKINS
Defendant:
ASPIRUS EYE CLINIC and DOCTOR SHALEN JOHNSON
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3752
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Dubose v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Walter Allen Dubose
Defendant:
Paul Campbell, Donna Norman, Chris Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Rashad Jenkins
Defendant:
Audwon Green, La'quenah Jackson, Michael Paschal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Jenkins-White et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Angela Jenkins-White and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Darryal Ledel Jenkins
Defendant:
CO Smith, T Barentro, CO Krome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parkins v. Staten et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M Staten, Scott Taylor, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HODGE v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24738
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT HODGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, K WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins #962092 v. Aspirus Eye Clinic et al
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jenkins #962092
Defendant:
Aspirus Eye Clinic and Shalen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
