Cases 21 - 30 of 37
HALL v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE HALL
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. LOMBARDO, GREG COLLINS, JANE DOE (JAIL NURSE) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cerasoli v. Lombardo et al
as 3:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
Dino Cerasoli
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo and NAPHCARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombardo #290381 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02193
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Joshua Karkoff, Unknown Purdy and others
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bassett v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv03391
Plaintiff:
Steven Bassett
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections and Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Johnson et al
as 5:2011cv06095
Plaintiff:
Clarence Campbell
Defendant:
Jean Ann Johnson, Knoll and George Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Lombardo v. E. Babridge
as 10-7221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM LOMBARDO
Defendant - Appellee:
E. BABRIDGE, Sergeant, J. MCCOMBS, Sergeant and J. SHAPIRO, Officer
Defendant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cooper v. Archeletta et al
as 1:2010cv00560
Plaintiff:
Dana Cooper
Defendant:
Archeletta, Duty, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Archeletta et al
as 1:2010cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dana Cooper
Defendant:
Archeletta, Duty, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dordly Baptiste v. C.O. Lockowitz, et al
as 09-3907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DORDLY BAPTISTE
Defendant - Appellee:
C.O. LOCKOWITZ, A IULA, C.O., C.O. STAPLETON, Shield #1470 and others
BAPTISTE v. LOCKOWITZ et al
as 2:2009cv04335
Plaintiff:
DORDLY BAPTISTE
Defendant:
LOCKOWITZ, A. IULA, STAPLETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
