Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Aaron Jones v. Bradley Mermon, et al
as 12-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON MICHAEL JONES, a/k/a Michael John Aaron Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
BRADLEY MERMON, Officer Robinson Township Police, DALE VIETMEIER, Robinson Township Police, ANDREW BRUGGMAN, Trooper Pennsylvania State Police and others
Washington et al v. Denney et al
as 5:2012cv06039
Plaintiff:
Ecclesiastical Denzel Washington
Defendant:
Larry Denney, Jay Nixon, Chris Koster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ROBINSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
AARON MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRADLEY MERMON, DALE VIETMEIER, ANDREW BRUGGMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dinkins v. Webb et al
as 1:2009cv00001
Plaintiff:
George Dinkins
Defendant:
Stacey Webb, Towanda Zachery, Marty Brock and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JONES v. FCI BRADFORD CORRECTIONAL STAFF et al
as 1:2008cv00307
Plaintiff:
AARON MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
FCI BRADFORD CORRECTIONAL STAFF and FCI BRADFORD MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MILLER v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2008cv03335
Plaintiff:
RICKY MILLER
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE HAYMAN, LYDELL SHERRER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2007cv03265
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric Jenning and J Gunja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Ozmint et al
as 2:2007cv02480
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, Stan Burtt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Reynolds
as 2:2007cv01204
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Cecilia R Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
