Cases 41 - 50 of 5,955
Gonzalez v. Bennett et al - DO NOT FILE ANY DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-CT-3139-FL.
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Hugo Gonzalez
Defendant:
Adam Matthew Bennett, Theodore Benjamin Lee, Anthony Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Harris v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, LIEUTENANT DELITZ and others
Gardner v. Pierre-Louis
as 2:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Gardner
Defendant:
Officer Pierre-Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Hawkins v. Tonya Conley, et al
as 24-1880
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. HAWKINS, also known as JOHN ANTHONY HAWKINS-EL
Defendant:
TONYA CONLEY, DONNY BETZNER and RICHARD BROWN
Evans v. Jovanovich et al
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Anthony Evans
Defendant:
Sam Jovanovich, Travis Jones and Kimberly Malcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Croom v. Joshua Schoenback, et al
as 24-1875
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L. CROOM
Defendant:
JOSHUA SCHOENBACK, TERRANCE JACKSON, SANDY WALKER and others
Karlester Young v. Kip Hallman, et al
as 24-1920
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, President of Wellpath Holdings, PAUL NOEL, Chief Medical Director, ANTHONY LITIZIO and others
Lyons v. Warren et al
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Anthony Antonio Lyons
Defendant:
Tammy Warren and Chad Partin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Fowler v. Lucas Bohnert, et al
as 24-1840
Plaintiff:
PETER FOWLER
Defendant:
LUCAS BOHNERT, Correctional Officer, JOSEPH CHILDERS, Correctional Officer, ANTHONY WILLS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
