Cases 61 - 70 of 118
BANKS v. BABBCOCK et al
as 2:2015cv01584
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
BRIAN BABBCOCK, MARK HORNAK, ADRIAN N. ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al
as 3:2015cv00843
Plaintiff:
Daniel George Kelley
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Health Care, Unknown Kern, Unknown Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. King et al
as 5:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Defendant:
A King, Snow, Chisom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Godinez et al
as 3:2015cv01022
Plaintiff:
Commodore Jackson
Defendant:
Taylor Godinez, Warden Spiller, Warden Gaetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Virga et al
as 1:2015cv02048
Plaintiff:
Eric Zachary Anderson
Defendant:
Tim Virga, L. Eldridge, Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHINE v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA et al
as 2:2015cv02354
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ESTATE OF JOSHUA DIALLO JONES et al v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2014cv05095
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOSHUA DIALLO JONES and JANICE JACKSON
Defendant:
ANGEL SANTIAGO, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONS OFFICER 1-10, JANE ROE SUPERVISOR 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadian v. Digironamo et al
as 1:2014cv03441
Plaintiff:
Mayer Sadian
Defendant:
Digironamo, Timothy O'Brien, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARSONS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01556
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PARSONS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B.O.P., FEDERAL DETENTION CENTER PHILA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
EMIGH v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv01266
Plaintiff:
JACKIE EMIGH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY , DAVID HOGUE , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
