Cases 71 - 80 of 3,649
Poore v. Lammer et al
as 1:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Poore
Defendant:
Brian Lammer, . Jenkins, . Borden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Sheriff's Department Staff of Criminal Justice Facility
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Miller, Jr
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department Staff of Criminal Justice Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Weber v. County of Erie, et al
as 24-1477
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD WEBER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ERIE, ERIE COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN BRYANT and others
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wimberly v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Craig Ervin Wimberly
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, C. Herman, J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. MCPHEARSON et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
IRA LEE COLLINS
Defendant:
MCPHEARSON, MILLER and JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. South Carolina Dept of Corr Cooperation et al
as 0:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr.
Defendant:
South Carolina Dept. of Corr. Corporation, Kershaw Corr. Inst., Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EASLEY-EL v. WARGNY et al
as 1:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
LERON EVERETT EASLEY-EL
Defendant:
CHLOE WARGNY and JOHN MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Wise
as 7:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Miller
Defendant:
J. Wise and T. Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
