Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Dennison v. Counce et al
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
James Dennison
Defendant:
B J Counce, Gunnur Wilson, Jeremy Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Poinsett County Detention Center
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Henry Diaz
Defendant:
Poinsett County Detention Center, B J Carter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Leverenz et al
as 3:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Deputy B. J. Jesonek, Deputy K. E. McDonald, Deputy J. Rhoden and others
Plaintiff:
John William Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01203
Plaintiff:
DONTE BREWER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, -. OWENS, B. J. SALAMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bradley v. Suwannee Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2019cv00913
Plaintiff:
James Cliftion Bradley and James Clifford Bradley
Defendant:
Roy Donald, Suwannee Correctional Institution, B. J. Burnhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOZER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00047
Defendant:
THERESE CANTOLINA, BARRY A. SMITH, MUHAMMAD NAJI and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Scotland County Detention Center et al
as 5:2019ct03060
Defendant:
Scotland County Detention Center and Capt. B. J. Knight
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Meeks et al
as 2:2018cv00661
Plaintiff:
Mauro Gorostieta Hernandez
Defendant:
B J Meeks, Stephen Hoey, L Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. BARNES et al
as 1:2017cv00720
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
B. J. BARNES and GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. BARNES et al
as 1:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS COLEY
Defendant:
B. J. BARNES, GRIFFITHS, BLACKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
