Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hill et al v. Ms. Valdez et al
as 8:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill, Clifford E. Gaynor, Russell E. Lee and others
Defendant:
Ms. Valdez, Warden Roger Hester, Ms. H. Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Raybon et al
as 1:2021cv00423
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore
Defendant:
Terry Raybon, C. Stewart and C. Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond et al v. Pike County, Kentucky et al
as 7:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Kellianna, Matthew Lester, Pike County, Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
BRK, III and JTK
Executor:
Alicia Ann Bond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2018cv05670
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, C. Martella, Correction Officer Alamo and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Binkele et al
as 5:2018cv04856
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Perez
Defendant:
R. Binkele, E. Moore, R. Salgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Binkele et al
as 3:2018cv04856
Defendant:
Jeffrey H. Bass, A. Franco, J. Peffley and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv07156
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. MOORE, SR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00013
Plaintiff:
Thurmon E. Moore, II
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services , H. Hood , Doctor Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Corizon Medical Services et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00865
Plaintiff:
Thurmon E. Moore, II
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services , Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Cheek et al
as 5:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles E Moore
Defendant:
Allen Cheek and Robbie Fread
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
