Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00026
Plaintiff:
James R. Scott and James R. Chapman
Defendant:
Mr. McClain, Ms. C. Jones, Chatham County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Officer White, Chatham County Detention Center, Mr. Mclain and others
Plaintiff:
Joh'mz Mikhal Ransom and Jah'mz Mikhal Ransom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv50413
Defendant:
Sgt. Mrs. Rodriguez, Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Heferfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODY v. EDELEN et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
MR KING, BRYANT GOODWIN and CHRISTOPHER EDELEN
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD MOODY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHEY v. PURDUE et al
as 1:2019cv03541
Defendant:
MR. KING and MS. PURDUE
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ARCHEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Thomas et al
as 5:2017ct03266
Plaintiff:
Farley L. Bernard
Defendant:
Eddie Thomas, Mr. Monroe, Jimmy D. Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Sims v. King
as 16-1821
Plaintiff - Plaintiff:
Harold Shawgnessy Sims
Defendant - Appellee:
Mrs. King, Commissary Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
