Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McKiver v. Sineweee et al
as 8:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Deandre Lashun McKiver
Defendant:
Sergeant Sineweee and Officer Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby et al v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02298
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby, Robert L. Love, Jerrahmiah J. Rankins and others
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Burl Cain, Lieutenant Wten, Mr. Reynolds and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Runion et al
as 4:2021cv04024
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Sheriff Jackie Runion, Sergeant Hanning and others
Plaintiff:
Tevin Deray Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Katherine Wells, Corrections Officer Jeremy Stephenson, Terry Carl and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Eugenia Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TWARDZIK v. DEVERO
as 2:2020cv04105
Plaintiff:
JASON TWARDZIK
Defendant:
OFFICER ELLIS DEVERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duke v. Smith et al
as 4:2020cv04012
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Corporal Smith, Sergeant Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Caelin Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, A Johnson, Officer Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watford v. Ellis et al
as 3:2015cv00567
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Watford
Defendant:
Officer Ellis, Brad Bramlet, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
