Cases 1 - 10 of 487
McIntosh v. Parks et al
as 6:2024cv06270
Plaintiff:
John A. McIntosh
Defendant:
W. Parks, Sheriff Todd K. Baxter, The County of Monroe, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Creppel v. Cashio
as 24-30191
Plaintiff:
Jean Paul Creppel
Defendant:
J. R. Cashio, Captain, A-EMT #521, P. Smith, Sergeant, NREM-P #586 and Cynthia Park, Nurse Practitioner
Preston #235170 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Cook, Unknown Ryhdall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10701
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Cook, Ryhdall and others
Parks v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Evan Parks
Defendant:
Bob Gualtieri and Pinellas County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Janar Parks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLEY v. GILMAN et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALLEN WILLEY
Defendant:
TONI GILMAN, PARKE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and PARKE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Park et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Michael Trotman
Defendant:
Doctor Park, Doctor Henderson, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White (ID 76983) v. Parks et al
as 5:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bruce White
Defendant:
Andrew Parks, Evan Meredith, Bruce Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
