Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Joshua Vinson, Sr. v. Jason DeBruin, et al
as 24-1188
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LEE VINSON, SR.
Defendant:
JASON DEBRUIN, JUSTIN SCHMIDT-QUIST, STEPHEN JASKOWIAK and others
Vinson v. Colbert
as 3:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jaylen Vinson
Defendant:
Warden D. Colbert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
VINSON v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
CAMERON L VINSON
Defendant:
SARGENT A LYNCH, SHERIFF DEPUTY JAKE BASARD, SHERIFF SUPERVISOR JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Andrew Vinson
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkhart v. Vinson et al
as 2:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Dustin Burkhart
Defendant:
Brian Vinson, Camden County, Missouri, Tony Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paris Funderburk v. Johnson
as 22-7141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PARIS LAQUISHA FUNDERBURK
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY JOHNSON, DEPUTY N. VINSON, DEPUTY WILLIAM BALLEW and others
Sapp v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Sheriff Alfonzo Williams, Jason Vinson, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Burnett et al
as 1:2022cv01981
Plaintiff:
Wayne King
Defendant:
Edward Burnett, Akinola F. Akinyombo, Ms. Vinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinson v. Wheat
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Renard Vinson
Defendant:
Michael T Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Holloway et al
as 5:2021cv05233
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Wilson
Defendant:
Sheriff Holloway, Corporal Bejamin Vinson, Jr., Deputy Bridenstine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
