Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Sherbert v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv00605
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Akeem Franks
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sherbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. United Parcel Service Inc (Ohio) et al
as 3:2020cv00098
Plaintiff:
Fredeicka Wright
Defendant:
Edward Small, Tyler Burns and United Parcel Service Inc (Ohio)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Spears et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00829
Plaintiff:
Perry Loggins, Allen Peace, Dewayne Spears and others
Defendant:
Karen Vaughn, Karen L Parkes, Dave Sabin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Balderas, Jr. et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Cody Tennant, Armando Balderas, Jr., Jon Ransom and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
HARRIS et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2018cv02277
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith, CYNTHIA HARRIS and Devin Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Curry v. UPS Inc, et al
as 17-3352
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBERT CURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 623
Not Party - Appellant:
MATTHEW B. WEISBERG
Robert Curry v. UPS Inc, et al
as 17-3144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CURRY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC and TEAMSTERS LOCAL 623
Carlisle v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 17-2905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert W. Carlisle
Defendant - Appellee:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Teamsters Local 687, an affiliate of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Conner v. Teamsters Union Local No. 665 et al
as 3:2017cv05047
Plaintiff:
Brian Conner
Defendant:
Teamsters Union Local No. 665 and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Buckner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00417
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eugene Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
