Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Jackson v. Montefiore Home
as 1:2018cv02539
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jackson
Defendant:
Montefiore Home
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
JACKSON v. JEFFERSON HOSPITAL FOR NEUROSCIENCE
as 2:2018cv03871
Defendant:
JEFFERSON HOSPITAL FOR NEUROSCIENCE
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY JACKSON
JACKSON v. RAY SKILLMAN GMC TRUCK, INC.
as 1:2018cv02335
Plaintiff:
RAY SKILLMAN GMC TRUCK, INC. and RAMONA K. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jackson v. Solera et al
as 3:2018cv01707
Plaintiff:
Emily K Jackson
Defendant:
Solera and Audatex North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
HOLLANDER v. MORGAN PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv08734
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA HOLLANDER
Defendant:
MORGAN PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC , EAST COAST CRANBURY , ALICIA JACKSON and others
Counter_claimant:
ALICIA JACKSON , ABC COMPANIES (1-10), MORGAN PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
JOSHUA HOLLANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Jackson State University et al
as 3:2018cv00230
Plaintiff:
Tracie B. Thomas
Defendant:
Jackson State University and John and Jane Doe I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michelle Jackson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 17-10872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Jackson v. First Financial Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01602
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
First Financial Asset Management, Inc. and First Financial Asset Management of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Cunningham v. Jackson Energy Authority
as 1:2017cv01064
Plaintiff:
Fred Cunningham
Defendant:
Jackson Energy Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Miller-Jackson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Stacey Miller-Jackson
Defendant:
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. and NMA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
