Cases 161 - 170 of 831,297
Hans Kissle Inc v. Echo Lake Foods Inc
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Hans Kissle, Inc. and Hans Kissle Inc
Defendant:
Echo Lake Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ATECHGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
ATECHGOV, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Israel v. Tomlison et al
as 4:2024cv03718
Plaintiff:
Akiva Israel
Defendant:
S. Tomlison, C. Sanchez, Correctional Officer Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. AINSLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff:
S. JALIL REED
Defendant:
C.O. AINSLEY, C.O. COOPER and SGT NAHLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moss v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv01144
Petitioner:
Clovis Costell Moss, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breig v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02678
Plaintiff:
Hannah Breig
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
PATTERSON v. MENARD, INC.
as 1:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
TRACY PATTERSON
Defendant:
MENARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Lenti v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
John Lenti
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Frankie Cuevas and Sara Tessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wanstall v. D40 Gravel LLP et al
as 2:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Pamela Wanstall
Defendant:
D40 Gravel LLP, Town of Burke, Vermont and Caledonia Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
