Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Cathy Marie Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Marie Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
US Attorney - Social Security Noticing and Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Williams
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03247
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Tanya Marie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06831
Plaintiff:
Sonja Marie Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2019cv01078
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Plaintiff:
Mary Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2018cv02054
Plaintiff:
Sheila Marie Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv10052
Plaintiff:
Jamie Marie Williams
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00452
Plaintiff:
Tammy Marie Williams Robison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv30062
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.