Cases 71 - 80 of 829,982
E. D., et al v. Noblesville School District, et al
as 24-1608
Plaintiff:
E. D., a minor, by next friend MICHAEL DUELL, LISA DUELL, as parent and next friend of E.D., MICHAEL DUELL, as parent and next friend of E.D. and others
Defendant:
NOBLESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, NOBLESVILLE HIGH SCHOOL, BETH NIEDERMEYER and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
In Re: Baby Food Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2024md03101
Plaintiff:
VZ, D. P. U., Z.W. and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D. et al v. CooperSurgical, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03527
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Wiltz v. Grieves et al
as 8:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Captain Robert Wiltz
Defendant:
A. Grieves, Pinellas County Jail, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson #268686 v. Thornell
as 4:2024cv00296
Petitioner:
Vincent S Simpson
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodell v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodell, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
