Cases 11 - 20 of 49
State of Delaware v. B.P. America Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Chevron Corporation, XTO Energy Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charleston, City of v. Brabham Oil Company Inc et al
as 2:2020cv03579
Defendant:
Chevron Corporation, Enmark Stations Inc, BP America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charleston, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CITY OF HOBOKEN v. EXXON MOBIL CORP. et al
as 2:2020cv14243
Defendant:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, PHILLIPS 66, EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF HOBOKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamilton v. ConocoPhillips Company et al;
as 6:2020cv00059
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company and Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Michael Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
State of Tennessee ex rel Slatery et al v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 3:2018cv00425
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Conoco, Inc., ConocoPhillips Company and others
Plaintiff:
Shari Meghreblian, Herbert H Slatery and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 3:2018cv00421
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Conoco, Inc., American Agricultural Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00463
Defendant:
Veolia Environmental Services Waste-to-Energy, Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter
3Rd Party Defendant:
The North Carolina Granite Corporation, FABRI-KAL Corporation, The National Lime and Stone Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cross Defendant:
Electric Equipment Corporation of Virginia, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated.
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Duke Energy Progress, LLC v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00460
Defendant:
Tennessee Associated Electric, Inc. or Tennessee Associated Electric, Union Electric Company, American Electric Corporation and others
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter and Mr. David Oscar Ledbetter
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC doing business as Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Barnes & Powell Electrical Company, Inc., Trinity Industries, Inc., Georgia-Pacific, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Cross Claimant:
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina and/or SMI-Owen Steel Company, Inc. and/or SMI Steel
Counter Claimant:
Ohio Valley Medical Center, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Counter Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Rockwell International Corporation and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, United States Department of the Air Force, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Colonial Pipeline Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, United States Navy and others
Plaintiff:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Appellant:
Revere Copper Products, Inc., AKA Revere Copper & Brass Incorporated
California Department of Toxic Substance Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00729
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co Inc, Ameron International Corporation, Anardarko E&P Onshore LLC and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Toxic Substance Control and The California Toxic Substances Control Account
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
