Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 262
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant: ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Intervenor: The Children's Hospital Association, 340B HEALTH, THEAMERICIAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, LITTLE RIVERS HEALTH CARE INC, RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Avon Nursing and Rehabilitation v. Azar
as 23-492
Plaintiff / Appellant: Avon Nursing and Rehabilitation, Brightonian Nursing and Rehabilitation, Woodside Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra, in his capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco
Defendant: Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner: State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party: County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae: Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Asapansa-Johnson Walker et al v. Azar II et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02834
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Plaintiff: Tanya Asapansa-Johnson Walker, Cecilia Gentili and House of Representatives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
R J Reynolds Tobacco v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-40076
Plaintiff / Appellee: R J Reynolds Tobacco Company, Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Incorporated, ITG Brands LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Stephen M. Hahn, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Robinson v. Austin et al
as 8:2023cv00224
Plaintiff: Bobby L. Robinson, II
Defendant: Lloyd J. Austin, III and Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
ROBINSON v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2022cv02590
Plaintiff: BOBBY L ROBINSON, III and BOBBY L. ROBINSON, II
Defendant: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and FRANK KENDALL, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Daniels Ranch, LLC et al v. Farm Service Agency of United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03099
Plaintiff: Daniels Ranch LLC, Super Orchards II LLC, Quincy Ranch LLC and others
Defendant: Farm Service Agency of United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and Thomas J Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kincaid et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff: Caywon Kincaid, Darryl Montgomery, Rubyn Murray and others
Defendant: United States Department of the Treasury and Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Asapansa-Johnson Walker v. Becerra
as 20-3580
Defendant / Appellant: Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Tanya Asapansa-Johnson Walker and Cecilia Gentili

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?