Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Louisiana et al v.Centers for Disease Control & Prevention et al
as 6:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Arizona, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Rochelle Walensky, U S Dept of Health & Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Jodey C Arrington, Brian Babin, Jim Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 22-30087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, by and through its Attorney General, Jeff Landry, State of Alabama, by and through its Attorney General, Steve Marchall, State of Florida, by and through its Attorney General, Ashley Moody and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Bradford, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 22-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUKE BRADFORD, ARKANSAS VALLEY ADVENTURES, LLC, AKA AVA Rafting and Zipline and COLORADO RIVER OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae:
ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER and others
Petitioner:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
The State of Georgia v. Georgia Department of Community Health et al
as 2:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia and Georgia Department of Community Health
Defendant:
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Xavier Becerra, The United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
OH, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 21-4235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, in their official capacities, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv04370
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U S Dept of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children & Families and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Tennessee et al v. United States Department of Education et al
as 3:2021cv00308
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Association of Christian Schools International, A.S., C.F. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Women's Human Rights Campaign and Women's Declaration International USA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Louisiana et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2021cv03970
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, State of Montana, State of Arizona and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
