Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., et al v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-3230
Plaintiff / Appellant: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., State of West Virginia, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merrick B. Garland, in his Official Capacity, as Attorney General of the United States, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach, in his Official Capacity, as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Appellant: Members of Congress
Safe Alternatives for Our Forest Environment et al v. Birkey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01940
Plaintiff: Safe Alternatives for Our Forest Environment, Klamath Forest Alliance and Conservation Congress
Defendant: Rachel Birkey and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Klamath Forest Alliance et al v. United States Forest Service
as 3:2023cv03601
Plaintiff: Klamath Forest Alliance, Earth Island Institute, Sequoia Forestkeeper and others
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Heidi Stirrup, et al v. DOD, et al
as 23-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant: Heidi Stirrup, personally and in her capacity as a member of the United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, Mark Edward Green, personally and in his official capacity as a member of the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors, and a Member of the Unites States House Armed Services Committee, and the United States Congress, Ralph Warren Norman, Jr., personally and in his official capacity as a Member of the United States Congress and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, General, USA (Ret.), in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff: Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition, Inc., West Virginia, State of, North Dakota, State of and others
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, The and Steven Dettelbach
Petitioner: Members of Congress
Amicus Curiae: Robert M. Miller, Ph.D.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant: Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae: The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00372
Plaintiff: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Lifenet, Inc. and East Texas Air One
Consolidated Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians Advocacy Institute, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff: Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. State of Texas
as 21-1445
Interested Party: LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, WASC SENIOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COMMISSION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Defendant: NATHANIEL R. MENDELL, US Attorney and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner: FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, JILL DOE, ANNE DOE and others
Not Yet Classified: NEW YORK STATE COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?