Cases 1 - 10 of 83
White Hat v. Murrill
as 24-30272
Plaintiff:
Anne White Hat, Ramon Mejia, Karen Savage and others
Defendant:
Jeff Landry, in his official capacity as Attorney Generalof Louisiana, M. Bofill Duhe, in his official capacity as District Attorney of the16th Judicial District Attorney's Office, Becket Breaux, in his official capacity as Sheriff of St. Martin Parish and others
Kinney v. Temple et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Henry W. Kinney
Defendant:
Mr. Timothy Temple, Ms. Elizabeth Baker Murrill, Timothy J. Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
GIBSON et al v. STROUD et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON GIBSON and MICHELLE P. GIBSON
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Scott v. Austin Regional
as 23-50436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Scott, Ashley Combs, as next friend of L.S., a minor child, Juan Silva and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Austin Regional Clinic, Donald Kreag Murphey, Medical Doctor, ARA Diagnostic Imaging and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant:
VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor:
TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee:
VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
Women of Color for Equal Justice v. The City of New York
as 22-3065
Plaintiff:
Jo Saint-George, Esq.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Women of Color For Equal Justice, Remo Dello Ioio, Elizabeth Loiacono and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Eric L. Adams, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union, et al v. Mici, et al
as 22-1747
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MA CORRECTION OFFICERS FEDERATED UNION, (MCOFU) and MICHAEL MOSHER
Plaintiff:
ZAC GUSTAFSON, DENINA DUNN and ANGELA PUCCI
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROL A. MICI, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Correction and CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Interested Party:
PRISONERS' LEGAL SERVICES, DR. YONATHAN GRAD, DR. MONIK C. JIMENEZ and others
Bleuer, et al v. Nigrelli, et al
as 3:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Rev. Justin Bleuer, Berean Bible Church, New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and others
Defendant:
Kevin P. Bruen, Michael Korchak, Lori Pettit Riemann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waller v. Baker
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrance Waller
Defendant:
Jean Peters Baker
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0923 Denial or revocation of firearms license
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
