Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Almeida v. Taxiarchos et al
as 1:2024cv10704
Plaintiff: Ana Almeida
Defendant: John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Almeida et al v. Taxiarchos et al
as 1:2024cv10408
Plaintiff: Debra Almeida and Joseph J Santos
Defendant: John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff: Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Keitel v. D'Agostino, Sr.
as 23-933
Plaintiff: FJK Tee Jay Inc., a Florida Subchapter S Corporation, FJK Tee Jay, LTD, a Florida general partnership and Florida Capital Management LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
Plaintiff / Appellant: Frederick J. Keitel, III, individually, and as President of FJK IV PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: Thomas B. D'Agostino, Sr., individually , and as Trustee(s) for the Thomas B. and Elizabieta D'Agostino 1997 CRT TRUST, a New York Charitable CRT Trust, Elzbieta D'Agostino, Schain Leifer Guralnick, a New York Certified Public Accounting firm and others
GOODLIN v. ROSE et al
as 2:2023cv02304
Plaintiff: HERBERT SETH GOODLIN
Defendant: ALEX ROSE, delaware county daily times, FOLCROFT BOROUGH DETECTIVE CORPORAL DANIEL E. WHITE, OFFICIALLY AND IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keitel v. D'Agostino, Sr.
as 23-77
Plaintiff: FJK Tee Jay Inc., a Florida Subchapter S Corporation, FJK Tee Jay, LTD, a Florida general partnership and Florida Capital Management LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company
Plaintiff / Appellant: Frederick J. Keitel, III, individually, and as President of FJK IV PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida Corporation
Defendant / Appellee: Elzbieta D'Agostino, Schain Leifer Guralnick, a New York Certified Public Accounting firm, Tee Jay of Florida RLLP, Virginia limited Partnership and others
Reddy, et al v. Foster, et al
as 16-1432
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARY ROSE REDDY, SUE CLIFTON, JENNIFER ROBIDOUX and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH A. FOSTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of New Hampshire, D. CHRIS MCLAUGHLIN, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Cheshire County, NH, SCOTT W. MURRAY, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Merrimack County, NH and others
Defendant: THOMAS P. VELARDI, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Strafford County, NH and DERRY, NH
RHC Operating LLC v. City of New York
as 22-923
Plaintiff / Appellant: RHC Operating LLC
Defendant / Appellee: City of New York, Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of New York City, Adrienne E. Adams, New York City Council Member and others
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, et al v. California Department of Social Services, et al
as 8:2021cv01488
Plaintiff: Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Adeona Health Care, LLC and Tonmoy Sharma
Defendant: California Department of Social Services and Gregory Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?