Cases 21 - 30 of 1,013
Wegner v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv03234
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wegner
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
David Gregory Flores v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv08477
Plaintiff:
David Gregory Flores
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mynyk v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
John Gregory Mynyk
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
GAY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv02439
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GAY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Foronda v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv14140
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Foronda
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOODLAND v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv02489
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. WOODLAND
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gregory v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv04017
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gregory
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Grove v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02527
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Grove
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
