Cases 21 - 30 of 96
Harrington v. Saul
as 4:2020cv04148
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Steven Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Harrington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Brian Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harrington v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00852
Plaintiff:
Mary C Harrington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harrington v. Social Security et al
as 2:2020cv10954
Defendant:
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, Commissioner Social Security and United States Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Donald Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Harrington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00337
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Janae L Harrington and Janae L. Harrington
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HARRINGTON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
GIANNA MARIE HARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HARRINGTON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
MIKE MASKILL HARRINGTON
Harrington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv02329
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
David M Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harrington v. Saul
as 4:2019cv03179
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jon D. Harrington, II
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Harrington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00544
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ralph Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
