Cases 21 - 30 of 526
Rymer v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv03315
Plaintiff:
Stacy Lynn Rymer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Whitaker v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Stacie Whitaker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MCKINLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
JAMES STACY MCKINLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stacy Tabor v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Stacy Tabor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv01988
Plaintiff:
Stacy Baker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nelson v Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stacy Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Kluza v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06464
Plaintiff:
Stacie Lyn Kluza
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stacy v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Stacy
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SPARKS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
STACY L. SPARKS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Barnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01544
Plaintiff:
Stacy L. Barnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
