Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Swift v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Clara Swift
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Swift v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv01828
Plaintiff:
Obasi Swift
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Marjorie Gertrude Cady v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-17000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARJORIE GERTRUDE SWIFT CADY
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Swift v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
David Swift
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Swift v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Brandon K. Swift
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Swift v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Kassie Swift
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Swift v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06079
Plaintiff:
James O Swift
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cady v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv01157
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Gertrude Swift Cady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Swift Eagle v. Saul
as 4:2021cv05052
Plaintiff:
Reuben Swift Eagle
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
