Cases 61 - 70 of 654
United States of America v. Williams
as 3:2021cv00098
Defendant:
Kenya Williams
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Williams et al
as 6:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Genesis Pabon, Karina Salgado Williams, Salgado Tax and Notary Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Tommie et al
as 2:2020cv00974
Defendant:
Jonathan William Cypress, Edna Tommie and Eric Cypress, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Connelly v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 2:2020cv01718
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Petitioner:
Mr. William O Connelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Oehmig et al v. United States of America (TV1)
as 1:2020cv00315
Plaintiff:
Alice C. Oehmig and William C. Oehmig
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Cromer v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2020cv01139
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, Charles Rettig, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Dempsey Cromer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Broadhurst Estate et al v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2020cv01337
Plaintiff:
William C Broadhurst Estate and Nancy D Broadhurst
Defendant:
U S DEPT of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212
Kaufman v. USA
as 1:2020cv03060
Plaintiff:
William G. Kaufman
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Dyson
as 3:2020cv00809
Defendant:
William Dyson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Riley v. Ploutz et al
as 1:2020cv01177
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board, Seeger Industries, Inc., United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
